Courage

There is a rising tide of Islamophobia sweeping through the country, deliberately flooded by anti-Muslim bigots. Initially, opponents of a proposed Muslim community center – incorrectly but intentionally labeled as the Ground Zero mosque – were centered on respecting the feelings of families of 9/11 victims. The Muslim community center – not exactly at Ground Zero but more than two blocks away – not only complies with all applicable zoning regulations, it also received green light from the city Landmarks and Preservation Commission. Opponents of the project wanted the community center moved farther away from Ground Zero so as to not offend the families of 9/11 victims. But how far is far enough? Is Staten Island far enough? How about Ohio, Tennessee, Kentucky, Wisconsin or even California?

Throughout the country, fellow Muslim Americans are running into tremendous oppositions in finding new places where they can pray. For some, even California is not far away enough from Ground Zero for the Muslim community center. If Muslim Americans are not allowed to build the community center due to its proximity to Ground Zero, shouldn’t we also ban Catholics from building churches in any neighborhood where teenage boys were abused? How about prohibiting Baptists from constructing any churches because a few extremists bombed abortion clinics and murdered doctors? Israel brutally attacked USS Liberty resulting in the death of 34 American sailors with 170 seriously injured, so does it mean we should not allow Jewish Americans to build any synagogues in areas where survivors of this attack still live? Worse, in parts of the country, Muslim Americans are even harassed when they try to practice their faith.

When some vile opponents of the community center realized their argument that the community being too close to Ground Zero was weak and unconvincing, they switched track and started accusing the community center planners of having completely unproven ties to terrorist organizations. The vicious mud-slinging strategy of maligning Muslim Americans, making them the new boogeyman is all too clear to me: By throwing mud all over, they know at least some will stick. Some, like former Congressman Newt Gingrich, even made the preposterous argument that no “Ground Zero mosque” should be allowed until churches or synagogues are permitted in all of Saudi Arabia. The last i heard, the United States of America is not a theocracy, so does Gingrich want to replace our core values with Saudi Arabia’s? Women are not permitted to drive in Saudi Arabia and using Gingrich’s flawed logic, women should not be allowed to drive here either.

I understand some of the fear of Islam are genuine but if your daily sources of news about Islam and Muslims are “Fox News” and Jihad Watch, which selectively quotes passages from the Koran to prove that Islam is a violent religion hell-bent on world domination and killing infidels, how can you see the fact that majority of Muslims, especially Muslim Americans, have nothing to do with the so-called Jihadists? If i want, i can certainly pick out passages from the Holy Bible and the Talmud/Torah to demonstrate how violent Christians are and how vicious Jews are with regard to gentiles.

It pains me to see most Americans collectively blaming our fellow Muslim Americans for the crimes of a few. Many appear not to have learned the lesson of the brutal internment of Japanese Americans during WWII. It angers me to hear politicians inflaming – i liken it to shouting fire in a packed movie theater – the bigotry against Muslim Americans in order to score some cheap immediate political points.

Warren Buffett’s classic quote “it’s only when the tide goes out that you learn who’s been swimming naked” is equally applicable here. Now that the tide is out, bigots like Newt Gingrich and Glenn Beck are caught crapping and pissing in the water while many “yes Muslims have rights to build there but…” politicians - cowards from both political parties – are exposed not wearing any pants. Saying Muslims have a right to build a community center two blocks from Ground Zero but they should not because a lot of people have “strong emotional resistance” is like telling African Americans they had the right to sit anywhere on the bus but they should only sit at the back because a lot of Whites would be offended if they sit at the front. You simply cannot defend the indefensible.

A recent poll by Pew Research Center shows that almost one in five Americans think President Obama is a Muslim. Instead of responding to the anti-Muslim smear by proclaiming the President’s personal religious belief is his own business and why it would not have mattered if he was a Muslim, Obama caved and the White House spokesman found the need to clarify that Obama “is obviously a Christian” and “he prays everyday.” Obama answering anti-Muslim slurs with “but I’m Christian” is like answering racism by saying, “but my mom was white.”

It would have been politically expedient to join the yes-but crowd. It also would have been politically safe to avoid discussing this at all cost. But it takes a significant amount of courage to speak up for and to defend the Constitutional right of the few, especially when going against the opinion of majority. One of the courageous few is Jake Towne, who is running as an independent Congressional candidate for the 15th district of Pennsylvania. Jake could have taken the easy way out by banding with the yes-but crowd or keeping quiet about this growing anti-Muslim hysteria. But no, Jake released a very courageous statement defending the rights of Muslim Americans to build the community center. At the moment when politicians are either fanning the anti-Muslim flames or cowering like cowards, Jake’s stance on protecting the First Amendment rights of Muslim Americans, knowing that it is likely a politically-suicidal move that may cost him some votes in the upcoming election, is extremely encouraging and is to be applauded. Courage is doing the right thing in the face of immense opposition by the majority. Jake Towne, i am proud to say, has it.

When i became a naturalized citizen of this great country, i swore to support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I am an atheist and i do not particularly like any religion. But i cannot sit down and keep my mouth shut while one particular group of Americans are having the freedom to practice their religion denied. I have been speaking out against this attempt to deny the Constitutional rights of Muslim Americans but i realized another way to honor my oath is to financially support Jake Towne’s campaign since i, not being from the same Congressional district, cannot vote for him. For Americans who strongly believe no one group of Americans can be denied of its rights, please support Jake Towne’s campaign.

4 Comments

Elaine ClaudioAugust 21st, 2010 at 19:17

Makes sense but why do I still seem to mistrust the reasons for this Mosque being built there. I still would vote for Jake tho if I was in his state.

ktulaAugust 21st, 2010 at 20:14

@Elaine: Thanks for leaving a comment. What are the reasons for your mistrust?

WildhorseAugust 21st, 2010 at 20:39

Ktula is absolutely correct. Washington, Madison and Jefferson would defend the right of the purchaser of the property to build, no matter how “insensitive” it may appear. Stop living by appearances. Move on. I am a registered Republican, reading Rules for Radicals just so I can have some kind of edge on infiltrating my own party, influencing it to return to their traditional platform! I am a Christian, reading the Bible, currently in Isaiah, (a Hebrew), chapter 17. God, great and powerful as He is….is willing to work with man in “baby steps”, but is man willing? Ktula’s arguments are strong and sound. Our Constitution, our Bill of Rights demands that we comply together in support of all U.S. citizens, including atheists, protestants, Catholics, Jews, Budhists, Muslims and everyone in between. Just because the drink you hold in your hand is a different color, doesn’t mean it ain’t koolaid.

LibertyloverAugust 22nd, 2010 at 07:18

There hasn’t been an investigation to find out who carried out the attacks.
What we got–and only after more than a year of the “Jersey Girls”–Patty
Casazza,
Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg, and Kristen Breitweiser–bringing such
pressure to bear that the administration finally agreed to put together the
9/11 Commission. It took about 444 days before people in the government
would acquiesce to an inquiry into what happened. Ultimately, after the
outcry by virtually all of the 9/11 families at the appointment of Henry
Kissinger to oversee the Commission, Kean and Hamilton were appointed.
Their final report–based on unsworn testimony and no evidence–represents
the government’s version of what happened. Behind the scenes, the various
teams (seven) had team leaders who all reported up to Phillip Zelikow, a
person with such closes ties to the administration, including his
co-authorship of a book with Condoleeza Rice and a prior post in Bush 41′s
administration, that this “investigation” represents the White House
essentially investigating itself. Only one team, one run by John Farmer,
General Counsel, had autonomy from Zelikow who essentially directed who
would “testify” (remember, no one was under oath), who would take testimony,
and what ended up in the report.

Subsequently, both Kean and Hamilton have come forward to say that at almost
every turn they were obstructed by members of the administration. They
suspected at the time that they were being lied to by members of the
military and have since stated flatly that they were lied to by the
military. This is the same military that, if one is to believe the official
version, failed so utterly on that day that one would think that at least
one person would have to fired, reprimanded, court martialed–something!!
Nothing. In fact, acting head of the Joint Chiefs at the time, Richard
Myers, not only did not suffer any consequence for his unmitigated failure
to lead the military in defense of the country, got promoted. Kean and
Hamilton, stating that the truth is so far from what they were told, asked
for a criminal investigation, specifically an investigation in this case
that would not include members of the administration and would include sworn
testimony subject to cross examination, submission of evidence subject to
expert testimony and cross examination–you know, an investigation. What
happened? Nothing.

John Farmer, also former Attorney General of New Jersey, has written a book
that details his experience on the Commission. He comes right out and says
that the official version of what happened is almost entirely untrue. OK,
then we need to know, yes? Where are the media? If most is untrue, what
part is true? The date? We do know that at least six of the alleged Muslim
hijackers showed up alive, several of whom were interviewed by the BBC and
London newspapers. Did we ever hear that on this side of the pond? Walid
al Shehri walked into his embassy and told people, “I’m alive.” Robert
Mueller, head of the F.B.I., stated on September 19, 2001 that the
identities of several of the alleged hijackers were in doubt. And remember,
this is a theory, eg. Muslim hijackers did it, without any proof or evidence
at this point, and yet we have Mueller telling us that the identities of the
some of the hijackers in the yet-to-be-proven theory are in doubt! Let us
also remember that this is the same F.B.I. that never indicted bin Laden for
9/11 because they admit they have “no hard evidence” linking him to the
attacks of 9/11. You just can’t make this stuff up.

The list of things like this goes on and on and on. The official story has
holes big enough to drive a truck through it, but what do “Americans” do?
They get all agitated over a plan by NYC Muslims to take a non-descript
building on a non-descript street dwarfed into oblivion by nearby office
towers a couple of blocks from the site of the World Trade Center and turn
it into a community center. It’s not a mosque and it’s not next to “Ground
Zero”. My fellow “Americans” couldn’t get off the couch to protest the
colossal failure of its own government; didn’t have the time or incentive to
protest when the lie of no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq revealed
itself; can’t get off the couch to protest nine years of war and occupation
in Afghanistan–a country that did us no harm–but conversion of a building
into a community center by Muslims? That they can protest. That gets them
off their couches. A total manipulation of very primal instincts based on
an unproven and almost “entirely untrue” theory. How frightening. How
pathetic.

I really have to ask myself in light of what now passes for “America” why I
even care.

Leave a comment

Your comment